Logarithmic Escape Theorem
Statement
Theorem (Logarithmic Escape). For any Dropping Set with period , the maximum number of consecutive self-transitions (drops where both and belong to ) starting from is at most:
Equivalently: no orbit can remain in the same dropping set for more than consecutive drops.
Significance
The contraction ratio alone would allow long self-chains (e.g., Set with ratio 0.949 could theoretically self-loop ~124 times from ). The modular tightening bound is much stronger and independent of the contraction ratio — it depends only on the period . This forces orbits to change dropping sets frequently.
Examples
Bounds by set:
| Bound | gives | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 9 | |
| 6 | 16 | 4 | |
| 8 | 32 | 3 | |
| 13 | 256 | 2 |
Verified chains for ():
| Required modulus | Smallest | Chain | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | ||
| 2 | 65 | ||
| 3 | 257 | ||
| 4 | 1025 | ||
| 7 | 65537 | 8-element chain |
Proof
By induction on chain length (modular tightening).
Each self-transition multiplies the required modular constraint by .
Claim: consecutive self-transitions require to satisfy a specific residue class mod .
Base (): Membership in requires .
Inductive step: Suppose self-transitions require .
Write . By the Affine Orbit Structure:
For dest to lie in mod (not just mod ), we need:
Since , this uniquely determines , giving:
Since is required, the chain length satisfies .
Corollaries
Corollary 1. No orbit can "camp" in a slow-contracting set. Even Set (, ratio 0.949) forces escape after ~2 steps for .
Corollary 2. Combined with the Bit Destruction Bound, this gives progress guarantees: orbits cannot accumulate many low-destruction drops from any single set.
Related Results
- Affine Orbit Structure — prerequisite: the affine formula that makes modular tightening work
- Bit Destruction Bound — uses this result to bound slow-drop windows
- 3-Adic Mixing — complements this: Log Escape bounds same-set chains, mixing bounds cross-set slow chains